Timing[]
There is no way to give "the deal" an absolute date. It could have happened on either Day 62 or Day 63. I didn't see any details to narrow it down any further. Dharmatel4 23:20, 26 November 2007 (PST)
- So it is either post-dusk/evening of Day 62, or pre-dawn/early morning of Day 63. Should we put something like "62 or 63" in the info box, or "62 evening/62 morning"? Maybe it's too cumbersome...? -- Graft talk contributions 23:36, 26 November 2007 (PST)
- King of the Castle had a similar problem but over a wider range of days. It's marked unknown on this one. I think it's better to put the elaborate details outside the box and mark it unknown. Dharmatel4 23:38, 26 November 2007 (PST)
- Yeah, that sounds reasonable. It would make things much easier if we could define the boundary between days as when daybreak occurs. ;) -- Graft talk contributions 23:48, 26 November 2007 (PST)
Write "62 or 63" in my oppinion.--Mc peko 13:03, 27 November 2007 (PST)
This maybe just my observation, but it's dark outside making it night. Michael was found on the night of Day 63, right, and I'm guessing the decoy village (which is on the shore) will be about a days walk from the line. Therefore it seems logical that this conversation would have taken place on Day 62, so that Michael would have a chance to leave the decoy village and be found by Jack and Kate on Day 63. After all, if the decoy was near the camp why would it take Sayid so long to get their via boat and why wouldn't Locke have found it (assuming that he has investigated the nearby area) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Burnside65 (talk • contribs) .
I agree with Peko and Graft, it should say day 62 or 63 in the infobox, because that is what we know. --Lewis-Talk-Contribs 07:38, 30 November 2007 (PST)
Why the spoiler alert?[]
Why? This is an oficial release --Hunter61 08:10, 1 December 2007 (PST)
- Agreed, although the argument would be that it isn't available to everyone (people outside US or people who do not have Verizon). --Lewis-Talk-Contribs 15:59, 1 December 2007 (PST)
- It has been removed. This is not a spoiler. It has officially been released to those who have access to it in the US. It is no different then ABC showing an episode. The main page lists what mobisode the wiki is updated to, the release of an mobisode on the phone is exactly the same as an airing of an ep on tv. If you are in England or anywhere else and cannot see an episode when it airs on tv, it is the same as not being able to see a mobisode when it is initially released on the verizon phones. Putting the spoiler warning on this page is like putting a spoiler warning on an episode article the day after the episode airs. -Mr.Leaf 16:38, 1 December 2007 (PST)
Future Encounter?[]
So far, this is the only time Michael and Juliet have appeared together. I wonder what will happen when/if Michael and Juliet meet again. I mean, how will future TV episodes explain their previous encounter? They would have to show this clip on TV, or else the strictly TV viewers won't understand how they already know one another. And so maybe these mobisodes will eventually air on TV in Season 4?? Or maybe Michael and Juliet won't ever meet again, which would be kind of hard to do, unless Juliet dies or leaves the island somehow before Michael came back (when/if he does). Anyone else curious how this will play out?--Vico 19:26, 16 December 2007 (PST)
- It seems we won't have to worry about a Juliet-Michael meeting now.--Marksman 14:00, 11 June 2008 (PDT)