Voting to Merge with Supernatural[]
This article is nominated for merging with Supernatural, vote Merge to support the nomination, or Keep to reject it and keep the two articles separated:
- Merge If we keep on divding every supernatural phenomenon on the Island like that, we will end up with a endless baby articles which we will soon loose track of, presenting a high chance for duplication of content. Also the "miracle" label might not work very well with all lost fans. What's a miracle to you, might be just a supernatural phenomenon to me with scientific roots that are yet to be discovered. -- 02:55, 12 November 2006 (PST)
- Merge - I agree with Nomad. -- Liz
- Merge. These events are really "mysterious"; "supernatural" or "miracle" are too specific and we don't know the nature of these events.--EvilSmoke 18:08, 20 November 2006 (PST)
- Merge. Close enough and small enough that they'd be stronger as one article. Don't think we should merge Coincidence, because the coincidences in the plot may or may not be the effect of some supernatural force. They could be part of a conspiracy, dramatic license or simply random chance. Merging cooincidence with Miracles/Supernatural automatically makes us all "men of faith". We may want to move all "Small world" encounters from Coincidence to Character relations . . . Rennerboy 14:56, 26 November 2006 (PST)
Decision Clear consensus here. I will merge the supernatural info in here, since Miracles is a better noun. --PandoraX 07:58, 10 December 2006 (PST)
Verdict[]
Question...After weeks of voting, and no votes to support its seperation, shouldn't this article be merged by now ?-- 11:12, 4 December 2006 (PST)
- Have some patience, Nomad :) We usually try to give it a few weeks (except in more cut and dry cases) to make sure all interested parties have a chance to have input... some users only come on every few weeks and don't always check nominations. But as it stands, the merge idea has a clear consensus, so I'm going to start the process. --PandoraX 07:58, 10 December 2006 (PST)
PictureNeeded ?[]
Why is there still a PictureNeeded template in this article ? I think that relative to its content size, 2 images is fine for now, and more can be added later when this article grows more. I wanted to remove the template, but thought to check for opinions first..Your thoughts guys ?
- -- 21:58, 12 February 2007 (PST)