argh, a typo I can't fix!!!!! --skks 12:18, 20 March 2006 (PST)
Non-canon vs non-canon warning
Is this meant to replace the latter? The warning is probably better for most of the things this been slabbed on. Saying something is non-canon and saying something might be non-canon are different things. The comments are sometimes 'prove me wrong' when this is used, but the template states a fact, and facts can't be proven wrong. If something can be proved wrong, it's not a fact, if there's any doubt on the matter or there's a chance that you're wrong about the matter, this shouldn't be used. --skks 01:49, 21 March 2006 (PST)
I used the tag because it is strong evidence that the websites in question are not official. So strong that I chose to replace the warning-tag with a "definitive-tag" :-) I can't offer any rewards, but I challenge everyone to come up with something that proves that any of the websites in fact IS offical. --Jambalaya 05:00, 21 March 2006 (PST)